Review





Similar Products

96
Randox custom biochip array
Custom Biochip Array, supplied by Randox, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom biochip array/product/Randox
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom biochip array - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac circoflex /ingelvac mycoflex
Ingelvac Circoflex /Ingelvac Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac circoflex /ingelvac mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac circoflex /ingelvac mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac circoflex®/ingelvac mycoflex
Ingelvac Circoflex®/Ingelvac Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac circoflex®/ingelvac mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac circoflex®/ingelvac mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac mycoflex
Ingelvac Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac®mycoflex
Ingelvac®Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac®mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac®mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim vaccine of swine mycoplasma hyopneumoniae sep ingelvac mycoflex
Vaccine Of Swine Mycoplasma Hyopneumoniae Sep Ingelvac Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/vaccine of swine mycoplasma hyopneumoniae sep ingelvac mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
vaccine of swine mycoplasma hyopneumoniae sep ingelvac mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac® mycoflex
Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® <t>(Ingelvac</t> ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® <t>MycoFLEX)</t> via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.
Ingelvac® Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac® mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac® mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim ingelvac ® mycoflex
Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® <t>(Ingelvac</t> ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® <t>MycoFLEX)</t> via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.
Ingelvac ® Mycoflex, supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ingelvac ® mycoflex/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ingelvac ® mycoflex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Boehringer Ingelheim flexcombo ® (ingelvac ® circoflex and ingelvac ® mycoflex)
Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received <t>FLEXcombo</t> ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.
Flexcombo ® (Ingelvac ® Circoflex And Ingelvac ® Mycoflex), supplied by Boehringer Ingelheim, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/flexcombo ® (ingelvac ® circoflex and ingelvac ® mycoflex)/product/Boehringer Ingelheim
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
flexcombo ® (ingelvac ® circoflex and ingelvac ® mycoflex) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: In this sense, the behavior of pigs after vaccination against PCV2 and Mhp with Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and/or Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) has been identified with this objective, where the piglets were more oriented, allowed touching, stood more, and ate more, demonstrating a greater level of welfare.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: In this sense, the behavior of pigs after vaccination against PCV2 and Mhp with Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and/or Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) has been identified with this objective, where the piglets were more oriented, allowed touching, stood more, and ate more, demonstrating a greater level of welfare.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of diarrheal cases ( A ), depression and flank scores ( B ), and individualized medication use ( C ) among piglets, based on different vaccination protocols (T1, T2, T3, and T4). a–b Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline

Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Journal: Vaccines

Article Title: Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis

doi: 10.3390/vaccines12111242

Figure Lengend Snippet: Behavioral and postural responses of piglets 12 and 24 h post-vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (Mhp), subjected to different vaccination protocols. a–c Distinct letters above the bars indicate significant differences ( p ≤ 0.05) according to Dunn’s post hoc test, performed following analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test. T1 received FLEXcombo ® (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX + Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) via intramuscular injection, followed by Enterisol ® Ileitis administered orally. T2 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis administered intramuscularly. T3 received Porcilis ® PCV M HYO via intramuscular injection, followed by Porcilis ® Ileitis also administered intramuscularly. T4 received FLEXcombo ® via intramuscular injection, followed by a 0.9% saline solution administered intramuscularly. A total of 60 piglets per treatment were evaluated.

Article Snippet: T1, T2, and T4 received the vaccines FLEXCombo ® : (Ingelvac ® CircoFLEX and Ingelvac ® MycoFLEX) (Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica Inc., St. Joseph, MO, USA) for immunization against PCV2 and Mhp.

Techniques: Injection, Saline